SCONTRO EPOCALE VANNACCI RIBALTA IL TAVOLO E ZITTISCE IL GIORNALISTA!
“Era il 24 febbraio scorso when the journalist intervened in an interview, speaking of brotherhood, love, tolerance and mercy, expressing her desire to live in a country where such values were respected. In contrast, she was speaking about a country where hate and discrimination were rampant.
She said that the General Vannacci made a distinction between normality and abnormality, basing it on numbers, which she thought was absurd. She invoked Article 3 of the Italian Constitution, which enshrines the principle of equality and the dignity of all citizens, regardless of race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, etc.
Referring to the Pope, she mentioned the words ‘chi sono io per giudicare' (Who am I to judge?). She then challenged the General's statements on homosexuality, saying that she did not believe him when he wrote that when he saw two men kissing, he turned away. Instead, she thought that his aversion to homosexuality was actually OMF (Opposizione alla Minacce contro la Fidelita della Famiglia).
She explained that this term is a form of anti-Semitism, racism and sexism, equal to hate crimes. Referring to freedom of speech, she stated that criticis is what drives progress, and if there are no critics, it becomes a concern because it might mean that only one truth is allowed to be told.
The General, Vannacci, had declared that people with different sexual orientations are abnormal. But the journalist insisted that being different does not mean that one is inferior or subhuman. On the other hand, some groups feel that they can't even be criticized. For instance, some feel that every criticism towards their lifestyle becomes a hate speech.
There are more ‘rights in more' in the favour of the ‘non-standard' population. For instance, they have more representations in the media, both in TV shows and movie productions, etc. That's not something to hide, according to the statistics.
Finally, the General, in conclusion, refuted any suggestions that the journalist was using personal feelings to judge the General Vannacci's words and actions. In his last statement, the General questioned the concept of freedom and the potential emergence of an Orwellian surveillance state by controlling thoughts through fear.”
Note: this text appears to be an excerpt of an interview and might need some reformatting or editing to meet the “800-word limit” constraint.
